Me:
Tending a small, walled garden
of rich, dark soil.
Knowing each rose by name
along the daily path.
The sun gentle, bees heavy
from bloom to bloom.
Evenings on the stone bench,
light softening.
To visiting friends,
offer freshly fallen pears.
The sweetest fruit, where
walls
keep out the wind.
“This is enough. It is whole.”
Myself:
Sweating on a bare, windy hill
hands raw from digging.
Not foundations, a channel
to the parched valley.
Working alone,
or in threes
through scentless nights
of turned earth and distant rain.
Sipping from a metallic canteen,
satisfaction: not a harvest for eating.
Blistered palms nod
horizon-ward
“That way, the water will run.”
I:
Sitting on the wall between
looking both ways.
The garden’s sun, the hill’s first cold drops
of the coming storm.
Not to tend or dig,
but to witness the tension,
the beautiful,
unbearable pull.
Seeing the full-fruited pear tree,
the first trickle reaching
the cracked valley soil;
joy, a strange alloy.
A leaf in one hand,
a cold, wet stone in the other.
Not deciding,
the bridge between is and ought.
Meaning growing in the space
between wall and wilderness.
Inspired by the article The Good Life Paradox at Philosophy Now. Best viewed on a big screen.
Today’s Daily Stoic poem:

I love the juxtaposing and melding of the two voices! Very cleaver and well crafted, bravo my friend!! 🩵
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Cara 🙏
LikeLike
I love how you hold these three selves in balance, the tender gardener, the digger, and the witness on the wall between them. The images are so vivid, such a thoughtful, resonant write.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Marja 🙏
LikeLike
The last couplet ties it all together nicely.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks JCN 🙏
LikeLike
I think it was Herclitus who said nothing can be properly joined until it has been fully separated — holding up and wide these three aspects of self, each in sensuous difference — a gorgeously ripe, apt and knowing tryptich. Well done.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Brendan 🙏
I must admit to having forgotten about this write as I did it a long while ago!
LikeLiked by 1 person
A very clever piece, can be read in combination or separate, as opposing or agreeing, a well balanced psyche.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Chris 🙏 I’m working towards my own well balanced psyche too.
LikeLike
Love the juxtaposition of the two voices here. Gorgeous write 🌸❤️
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Sanaa 🙏
LikeLike
very cleverly put together , they could be read as different poems but thet work very well together.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Reelika 🙏
LikeLike
I like the writing process, the different segments and perspectives, then the blending of the I. The ending part is the best part of it. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Grace 🙏
LikeLike
Brilliant. I loved it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yay! Thanks Judy 🙏
LikeLike
I love the contrast between your poems – really enjoyed the reflections and imagery – Jae
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Jae 🙏
LikeLike
I like the contrast, but even more the sense of peace at the end.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let’s hope we can all get there. Thanks Merril 🙏
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome, Shaun!
LikeLike
The synthesis of the two is what makes it whole.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cheers Björn 🙏
LikeLike
Such a tricky but rewarding form, Shaun, when it works as you have managed to do – so well…
I have tried it myself – https://how-would-you-know.com/x-for-exegesis-and-a-wildcard-poem/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your contrapuntal poem works very well Andrew. I have tried that before too. This one wasn’t written with the idea to read both across and down though. I will try that again sometime though. They take a lot more thought and time, which is a bit scarce at the moment.
Thanks Andrew 🙏
LikeLike
Me, myself and i; nicely blended thoughts
much love
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Gillena 🙏
LikeLike